heres a few suggestions

[Diogee old]

1. Change most working junkies in the records page to most junkies or add most junkies.



2. Records Displays the previous record holder

EXAMPLE
http://themill3in1.com/record.jpg

no longer would sending your junkies back into training get you off records

[Cushion]

makes it easier for gunners thou, knowing who was last on record, and we dont want to make the game easier do we

[Diogee old]

makes it easier for gunners thou, knowing who was last on record, and we dont want to make the game easier do we


easier for gunners makes it tougher.

[Cushion]

no coz then worth gunning would be easier and anyone who can worth gun good, will always kick a junkie players and a gunners ass :)

[Alc0]

I dunno, what about testing out in none medal game having no records.
Might be a laf.

[Cushion]

this is just a no win situation lol
records - makes it easier for gunners
no records - makes it safer for junkie players

[Alc0]

More junkie player the better, make gunners work a bit harder.

[DnD]

i say nay, its gunners task to watch the records, and that would make it nearly impossible for worthers to stay off the records.

[Cushion]

but then makes it easier for junkie players, but with a little risk of a random jump now n then, making the game easier or in favour just gets rejected, like i found out

in reply to alcopops answer lol :)

[steff]

I say no due to the fact that worth gunning becomes MORE difficult. Worth gunners hit most money and junkies usually at the end of every spend so when they take thereselves off it it'll be "previous".

[Diogee old]

I say no due to the fact that worth gunning becomes MORE difficult. Worth gunners hit most money and junkies usually at the end of every spend so when they take thereselves off it it'll be "previous".


ohh snap some one caught on :D


well its dont change - GAME STAYS THE SAME

change the record page - only changing would tell
although i like the idea put it into some of the non medal rooms and see how it does

[Cushion]

trust me mate, anything which make the game more easier will be rejected by staff lol

[Diogee old]

trust me mate, anything which make the game more easier will be rejected by staff lol

how would it make it easier besides for gunners to see sho has junkies but once gunners hit those records then they will get gunned which makes it harder for gunners as well

[Alc0]

but then makes it easier for junkie players, but with a little risk of a random jump now n then, making the game easier or in favour just gets rejected, like i found out

in reply to alcopops answer lol :)

to many gunners playing this game young pup, need a lil change and i think a no record list in either a none medal game or a private room would show some nice results.
I seen in another thread that bellows n others suggested that medals be played for like one city and that gets us thinking even more *just block guns and get every worth player in there for a round*
Private game if need be...
Might work might not.

[steff]

It won't work because everyone with a quarter a brain would play junkies and hoard all round.

[Alc0]

yes yes that would work :P
all players going in with pure junkie or selling, now that would be fun.

* altho a top 20 selected gunners could also join aye ;) *

Now that would be banging lmao.

[Bellows]

id rather see the junkie record changed so it works like Most Money, ie you hit MJ's and they lose enough that the next person in line now takes the record, instead of them staying on the record until they log in and spend tokens (Y)

[$treet pharmaci$t]

id rather see the junkie record changed so it works like Most Money, ie you hit MJ's and they lose enough that the next person in line now takes the record, instead of them staying on the record until they log in and spend tokens (Y)


i agree i think its bull shit when a person who got took 4 times is on the record cuz he or she has not logged in u jump them and get almost nothing

[steff]

Already pointed out. ;) I agree still to this day that it's balls, big hairy sweaty balls. (http://oldforum.oddthought.com/viewtopic.php?t=13823&start=0)