PDA

View Full Version : Some lovely Comments from my buddy?


YetAnotherKitten
16th January 2007, 01:15 AM
this was in my user cp...lol.


I cut myself 01-14-2007 12:50 AM do you get shitstains on your fat panties since you are to large to wipe your ass correctly fucking fat bitch lmaooooooooooooooo

^so proud of himself for that brilliant comment?

too bad you can't reply cus you are banned neener neener. idiot.

Dymond
16th January 2007, 01:22 AM
hey if it gets wet thas all the matters to me less she to big and got doo doo stains on her panties cause she cant wipe her own ass

WOW.. your admirer got his idea from Tung. ;-)

YetAnotherKitten
16th January 2007, 02:01 AM
Oh god that would be so sad if it wasnt actually tung.lmao

Mitch
16th January 2007, 02:14 AM
Stop being ghey

YetAnotherKitten
16th January 2007, 02:21 AM
why? even if I'm not gay I'll stil be older wiser and better at solitaire showdown than you :P

*edt\it and gaining on minesweeper you lil brat!

DeLeRiuM
16th January 2007, 05:26 AM
uh huhmmmmmm...... No offense to anyone but I feel like I've lost IQ points reading this thread....

Dymond
16th January 2007, 12:37 PM
that happens when reading some of the witty stuff posted anonymously in somebodies rep..

hoos
16th January 2007, 06:48 PM
uh huhmmmmmm...... No offense to anyone but I feel like I've lost IQ points reading this thread....

you are, and so am I :P

Deadwrong
16th January 2007, 08:58 PM
uh huhmmmmmm...... No offense to anyone but I feel like I've lost IQ points reading this thread....

o so im not the only 1 then?

YetAnotherKitten
16th January 2007, 09:11 PM
well everyone has their humor standards.

And after 20 plus neg reps from the same person and constant bitching and then he pretend to "turn over a new leaf" and then randomly bashes ou again out of knowwhere.. well that really crack me up. Especially the shit he comes up with. Like --does he really think that is the worst I've heard?

I would have put it in AIW but .. we dont have one!

Anyhow sorry I guess.. ? Hopefully I'll make a thread in the future that fits your needs/wants/desires. :P

Zeus
16th January 2007, 09:37 PM
well everyone has their humor standards.

And after 20 plus neg reps from the same person and constant bitching and then he pretend to "turn over a new leaf" and then randomly bashes ou again out of knowwhere.. well that really crack me up. Especially the shit he comes up with. Like --does he really think that is the worst I've heard?

I would have put it in AIW but .. we dont have one!

Anyhow sorry I guess.. ? Hopefully I'll make a thread in the future that fits your needs/wants/desires. :P

Getting a taste of ur own medicine aye.

Dymond
17th January 2007, 06:21 PM
One way or the other..he could at least sign his rep...

Eyez Neverclear
18th January 2007, 07:02 PM
If signing rep was even slightly important, your name would automatically be attached to it and visible by the person recieving it.

Someone hiding and talking shit will always be a slight step more repectful than some idiot that plays the e-bully talking shit seemingly in the open when really they are not. While both are still big bitches too scared to do it to someone's face the one with the fake name clearly has a much more pathetic existence in my not so humble opinion.

Aeon
18th January 2007, 09:39 PM
That is a great idea... btw... automaticly attaching names to rep.
i love it

Ridgeback
18th January 2007, 09:46 PM
That is a great idea... btw... automaticly attaching names to rep.
i love it

you mean you can't see who repped you? (a) the rep I see in my user cp has a "Posted by" column :P

Santo
18th January 2007, 09:48 PM
you mean you can't see who repped you? (a) the rep I see in my user cp has a "Posted by" column :P



corruption :argh:

Ridgeback
18th January 2007, 09:50 PM
corruption :argh:

i know!!! good isn't it (Y) :)

YetAnotherKitten
18th January 2007, 11:32 PM
Getting a taste of ur own medicine aye.

what are you talking about?

If signing rep was even slightly important, your name would automatically be attached to it and visible by the person recieving it.

Someone hiding and talking shit will always be a slight step more repectful than some idiot that plays the e-bully talking shit seemingly in the open when really they are not. While both are still big bitches too scared to do it to someone's face the one with the fake name clearly has a much more pathetic existence in my not so humble opinion.

Eh? Sorry but i really don't understand what you are getting at here.

Really I just thought it was funny I didnt expect people to get all twisty n what not. Infact I assume full well that Tung will be back.. and prolly after like a month of him being back he will come and see this maybe or not I dont know and probably make some comments ...really I haven't a clue...I don't expect that he will be too hurt its not like I said anything terrible, just that he neg reps me a lot randomly and I thought he was being decent but NOPE he's back on it for whatever random reason..

Dymond
19th January 2007, 02:48 AM
Yeah mods and admins can see who repped them..it would be nice to turn that on for all

Eyez Neverclear
19th January 2007, 03:11 AM
Eh? Sorry but i really don't understand what you are getting at here.

Really I just thought it was funny I didnt expect people to get all twisty n what not. Infact I assume full well that Tung will be back.. and prolly after like a month of him being back he will come and see this maybe or not I dont know and probably make some comments ...really I haven't a clue...I don't expect that he will be too hurt its not like I said anything terrible, just that he neg reps me a lot randomly and I thought he was being decent but NOPE he's back on it for whatever random reason..

It wasn't necessarily directed at you, just at the people that bitch about not knowing who repped them

odd th0mas
19th January 2007, 03:11 AM
Infact I assume full well that Tung will be back

where did he go?

Eyez Neverclear
19th January 2007, 03:15 AM
He was banned for messing having his way with the lesbian couple in a fashion that has been used for flaming 100's of times in the past, but he's tung

odd th0mas
19th January 2007, 03:20 AM
He was banned for messing having his way with the lesbian couple in a fashion that has been used for flaming 100's of times in the past, but he's tung

well that sucks.

what's disney world without mickey?

{EDIT} sorry yak for brief sidetracking of your thread.

Eyez Neverclear
19th January 2007, 03:35 AM
well that sucks.

what's disney world without mickey?

{EDIT} sorry yak for brief sidetracking of your thread.

It does, but unfortunately mods have days where they are fed up too and go off and do something they shouldn't

Santo
19th January 2007, 10:57 AM
It does, but unfortunately mods have days where they are fed up too and go off and do something they shouldn't


They did what they should, just not completly...

Kloaked Spirit
19th January 2007, 11:27 AM
He was banned for having NSFW browser crashing signatures. Then he was rebanned for posting the same crap in GC. Then he was banned again for the complete disregard of multiple staff requests to take his comments/actions to A/I/W. Nothing he did while in A/I/W lead toward the banning.

Fixed that for you good sir.

odd th0mas
19th January 2007, 04:14 PM
Fixed that for you good sir.

you can't get enough of banning this guy can you?

you ban someone for this petty of an offense, yet you let alot of real nasty shit slide in the SB! Don't say you don't cause i see your ass viewing SB at the time! i'm always waiting for the 'hypocrit' within you to shine thru,and....YOU ALWAYS DELIVER! lol. But, i see you've even gotten even a little uglier. now, you like to put words in other peoples mouth and edit their quotes to fit your agenda. how cool is that? IMHO, that is a MOST BANNABLE OFFENSE, so why don't you take it upon yourself and make yourself scarce for a few days?


{EDIT} LMFAO @ the 'browser crashing signatures' comment! WTF you got there, an ibm286 and dial-up? LOL!!!!

Kloaked Spirit
19th January 2007, 05:07 PM
you can't get enough of banning this guy can you?

you ban someone for this petty of an offense, yet you let alot of real nasty shit slide in the SB! Don't say you don't cause i see your ass viewing SB at the time! i'm always waiting for the 'hypocrit' within you to shine thru,and....YOU ALWAYS DELIVER! lol. But, i see you've even gotten even a little uglier. now, you like to put words in other peoples mouth and edit their quotes to fit your agenda. how cool is that? IMHO, that is a MOST BANNABLE OFFENSE, so why don't you take it upon yourself and make yourself scarce for a few days?


{EDIT} LMFAO @ the 'browser crashing signatures' comment! WTF you got there, an ibm286 and dial-up? LOL!!!!

- I wasn't responsible for banning him at all during this latest escapade. Nor did I ban him during the last series of times he's earned it. In fact, I've been pretty light on the ban stick for a while now. I honestly can't recall the last person I've actually banned from the forum (maybe bambi for the agreement that we made, which was released the minute he paid his end of it?)

- You must be new to things that are a constant within most forums. See it's quite popular for people to quote someone, fix the quote for accuracy, and type in "fixed." All that was replaced was the reason that "it was Tung" with the real reasons involved for the mods/admin banning him. All the cool kids do it.

- Please. If I were to leave, who would you have non-existant feuds with? I mean, you have to have someone to represent "the man" that you're so violently against. Anarchy forever!!! Actually I have been on vacation, so I really haven't been here for more than a few minutes at a time. Now see what happens? You know you need me to be over corrupt and hypocritical or the forum just isn't the same.

- Considering that many people (both staff and regular members) talked about the signature material, the fact that it was NSFW, and the fact that it hijacked or crashed a browser certainly makes the ban from his signature/linnk that much more valid.

odd th0mas
19th January 2007, 05:21 PM
- I wasn't responsible for banning him at all during this latest escapade. Nor did I ban him during the last series of times he's earned it. In fact, I've been pretty light on the ban stick for a while now. I honestly can't recall the last person I've actually banned from the forum (maybe bambi for the agreement that we made, which was released the minute he paid his end of it?)

- You must be new to things that are a constant within most forums. See it's quite popular for people to quote someone, fix the quote for accuracy, and type in "fixed." All that was replaced was the reason that "it was Tung" with the real reasons involved for the mods/admin banning him. All the cool kids do it.

- Please. If I were to leave, who would you have non-existant feuds with? I mean, you have to have someone to represent "the man" that you're so violently against. Anarchy forever!!! Actually I have been on vacation, so I really haven't been here for more than a few minutes at a time. Now see what happens? You know you need me to be over corrupt and hypocritical or the forum just isn't the same.

- Considering that many people (both staff and regular members) talked about the signature material, the fact that it was NSFW, and the fact that it hijacked or crashed a browser certainly makes the ban from his signature/linnk that much more valid.

how long did he have that sig before you guys finally couldn't take it anymore? that sig was there for quiite a while by my account.

...and you pretty creative guy, i'm sure you can express yourself without changing someones quotes. the whole idea of quoting someone is to get a verbatim account of what the person actually said, not.......WHAT YOU WANTED HIM TO SAY!

Kloaked Spirit
19th January 2007, 05:37 PM
I couldn't tell you how long he had it up. I've been "scarce" because I was on vacation. Based on what I've read regarding the issue, I'd say it was up less than a day. If someone wants to give you a more accurate answer, they're more than welcome to.

odd th0mas
19th January 2007, 05:41 PM
I couldn't tell you how long he had it up. I've been "scarce" because I was on vacation. Based on what I've read regarding the issue, I'd say it was up less than a day. If someone wants to give you a more accurate answer, they're more than welcome to.

no, i'd venture to say he had that sig for over a week. and who's to say that animated little she-fairy wasn't wearing flesh-colored pasties?

i mean, come on, the genre of this game and some of the language used here is reason enough for people not to be viewing this from work or school anyways. it is their fault....nobody elses!

Kloaked Spirit
19th January 2007, 05:50 PM
If that's how long the NSFW link was up than :argh: @ them. I honestly couldn't tell you any different.

Jimmy James
19th January 2007, 06:26 PM
If that's how long the NSFW link was up than :argh: @ them. I honestly couldn't tell you any different.

it was only in his sig for a few hours. I think thomas is talking about the child-like elves pic, not the link

odd th0mas
19th January 2007, 06:32 PM
it was only in his sig for a few hours. I think thomas is talking about the child-like elves pic, not the link

i was



but, i highly doubt the link he gave was near as graphic as the 2 links that i had in my sig for over two months.....and nobody ever said a word to me!

Santo
19th January 2007, 06:33 PM
It was more of an issue about how the link was labeled than the content, which was disturbing by the way.

odd th0mas
19th January 2007, 06:44 PM
here's a bright idea. how bout having a thread showing who was banned and for exatly what reason, and how long!

that way all bans are 'equal opportunity' and same offense will apply to everyone!!!

Santo
19th January 2007, 06:45 PM
here's a bright idea. how bout having a thread showing who was banned and for exatly what reason, and how long!

that way all bans are 'equal opportunity' and same offense will apply to everyone!!!

(Y) makes sense

There was something like it in the old forum.

odd th0mas
19th January 2007, 06:51 PM
(Y) makes sense

There was something like it in the old forum.

yeah, kind of like that but more detailed....should be like a police report, lol!

Phuquit
19th January 2007, 06:53 PM
you can't get enough of banning this guy can you?

you ban someone for this petty of an offense, yet you let alot of real nasty shit slide in the SB!
Tung *was* banned for SB abuse.
Want some consistency?
He got the exact same ban that Wraith got for a remark of the exact same nature in the SB...

For every crusading idiot like th0mas who whines about fascism whenever the rules get enforced, I get 10 PMs from people expressing their gratitude...

Beli
19th January 2007, 06:54 PM
it should be a locked thread

odd th0mas
19th January 2007, 06:56 PM
Tung *was* banned for SB abuse.
Want some consistency?
He got the exact same ban that Wraith got for a remark of the exact same nature in the SB...

For every crusading idiot like th0mas who whines about fascism whenever the rules get enforced, I get 10 PMs from people expressing their gratitude...

a little extreme and unprofessional to call me an idiot, aye?

Phuquit
19th January 2007, 07:31 PM
a little extreme and unprofessional to call me an idiot, aye?
Well what would you call someone who constantly comes to these threads, and spouts the same old bullshit, armed with nothing but innuendo and rumours?

You make a wonderfully graphic example of the old axiom "It's better to say nothing and have everyone think you're an idiot, than opening your mouth and removing all doubt"...

odd th0mas
19th January 2007, 10:19 PM
Well what would you call someone who constantly comes to these threads, and spouts the same old bullshit, armed with nothing but innuendo and rumours?

You make a wonderfully graphic example of the old axiom "It's better to say nothing and have everyone think you're an idiot, than opening your mouth and removing all doubt"...

4 an old axiom, you've used it quite often in SB! get some new lingo.

YetAnotherKitten
21st January 2007, 04:09 AM
It wasn't necessarily directed at you, just at the people that bitch about not knowing who repped them

oh. lol. I was confused.

--note-- its so funny in this thing called language.. how one person says soemthing out of sheer randomness.. and then the conversation has this amzing journey.. a veratable roller coaster if you will.... a roller coaster in a labyrinth... its wonderful and yet saddening because some people appear to not be fully armed with facts. I do this sometimes as well..

its a bummer when you make these statements not knowing the full background or antyhing.

anyway.. ghead and continue.. why not?? if you need to.. i dont care. its jsut a peice of electronic informaiton.. and its not like im talking about my mom or something..

so whats this.. tung is banned because we dont like trannys?? ahhahahah I cant wait till he comes back (he always does) to see what he calls me about this.