View Full Version : If any one doesnt like this idea i dare you to post
Dietryin
12th February 2007, 04:39 PM
ok
PLEASE . Rit
can we have a game the same as ww2
where premies and none premies join with the same turns
all the teams have the same research
a totally even start to a game
pluss no turn buying
doesnt look as good on paper
as what it did in my head :P
nappydreadlocks
12th February 2007, 04:41 PM
doesnt look as good on paper
as what it did in my head :P
fuck yeah.. i would start playing again.
Dietryin
12th February 2007, 04:51 PM
fuck yeah.. i would start playing again.
well ive just found out people BUY turns in ww2 ?
nappydreadlocks
12th February 2007, 04:54 PM
well ive just found out people BUY turns in ww2 ?
lmfao.. how pointless is that..
Grendel
12th February 2007, 05:31 PM
well ive just found out people BUY turns in ww2 ?
You've only just found that out?
Where have you been? Living in a hole in the ground just outside Berwick-upon-Tweed?
Guilty
12th February 2007, 05:48 PM
all the teams have the same research
sounds good except for the research being the same
Dietryin
12th February 2007, 06:20 PM
You've only just found that out?
Where have you been? Living in a hole in the ground just outside Berwick-upon-Tweed?
you know i dont live far from there :P
Grendel
12th February 2007, 06:23 PM
So you admit you live in a hole in the ground? :P
the squid of despair
12th February 2007, 07:12 PM
Terrible idea.
Sir Gordon Burch
12th February 2007, 09:04 PM
Why not have a pro ww2 and a begainer ww2 would that not solve some of the issues (y)
Jimmy James
12th February 2007, 09:07 PM
I don't like it
Quick Chow
12th February 2007, 10:36 PM
Why not have a pro ww2 and a begainer ww2 would that not solve some of the issues (y)
like what i said in the game talk its a bad idea. it wont solve any issues in ww2. some dipshit's gonna bust ans bust till they get enough rank points for pro. and not busting for 1k cycles isnt "pro" material.
Frazyer
12th February 2007, 11:27 PM
well people might still buy turns in pro ww2, so that doesnt really solve much at all.
Dietryin
13th February 2007, 04:20 AM
I don't like it
you dont like it because it doesnt say any thing about free markets
One Hit
13th February 2007, 04:23 AM
you dont like it because it doesnt say any thing about free markets
First of all i have to say LMFAO! to that comment. The truth is funny. :)
Secondly, i love the idea, but only because DT said it and im secretly in love with him.
Dietryin
13th February 2007, 05:08 AM
First of all i have to say LMFAO! to that comment. The truth is funny. :)
Secondly, i love the idea, but only because DT said it and im secretly in love with him.
tyler will be mad at you he hates any one who likes me
ok back to the game idea
gc3 has started to revolve around money more and more
lets have a game for the players please
time to bring true gameing
Jimmy James
13th February 2007, 05:28 AM
Tyler will be mad at you he hates any one who likes me
jeez, just cause I don't like your idea doesn't mean you gotta be a jerk about it :cry:
One Hit
13th February 2007, 05:35 AM
jeez, just cause I don't like your idea doesn't mean you gotta be a jerk about it :cry:
dont be a jerk about DT being a jerk man, NOT COOL.
and QC people wont bust EVERY time if we make the req'd rank points 50k or something ;)
Jimmy James
13th February 2007, 05:35 AM
dont be a jerk about DT being a jerk man, NOT COOL.
group hug? :hugs:
psychotic assasin
13th February 2007, 05:36 AM
i think that we should have ww2 without cities or mob aa's and engineering
Tenebrous
13th February 2007, 04:41 PM
i think changes should be made for a more historically realstic version
germany should be ahead in research and have more powerfull troops in the start, but cant for the entire game produce and many as the SU or Allies. Therefore just like in the real war a quick victory is the smarter way to win, where as right now its the opposite, also all of north africa should be included, and having italy would prehaps spice things up a bit
Tal Star
13th February 2007, 05:37 PM
i think changes should be made for a more historically realstic version
germany should be ahead in research and have more powerfull troops in the start, but cant for the entire game produce and many as the SU or Allies. Therefore just like in the real war a quick victory is the smarter way to win, where as right now its the opposite, also all of north africa should be included, and having italy would prehaps spice things up a bit
This Idea has some Merit...
but Either way a Pro/Beginner Ver would be nice.
tftmc
13th February 2007, 07:06 PM
ok
PLEASE . Rit
can we have a game the same as ww2
where premies and none premies join with the same turns
all the teams have the same research
a totally even start to a game
pluss no turn buying
doesnt look as good on paper
as what it did in my head :P
dietryin oh my god! you've actually done a service to the gc community with this one. great fucking idea!!! great great great!
Quick Chow
14th February 2007, 10:40 AM
This Idea has some Merit...
but Either way a Pro/Beginner Ver would be nice.
why would a pro/beginner be nice?
nappydreadlocks
14th February 2007, 10:13 PM
group hug? :hugs:
lmao would it be more like
:3some:
Jimmy James
14th February 2007, 10:27 PM
lmao would it be more like
:3some:
no, more like this
TD ---> :op: <--- DT
Monkeyman
14th February 2007, 10:55 PM
no, more like this
TD ---> :op: <--- DT
Again?
Jimmy James
14th February 2007, 11:10 PM
last time it was nappy
Dietryin
15th February 2007, 03:42 AM
no, more like this
TD ---> :op: <--- DT
:boonie: who wants to try it
lol
nappydreadlocks
15th February 2007, 02:05 PM
no, more like this
TD ---> :op: <--- DT
thats not a hug at all :smartass:
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.